Galaxy Rush VS One Touch C5
The Alcatel One Touch C5 has better specifications than the Samsung Galaxy Rush
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Samsung Galaxy Rush VS Alcatel One Touch C5
Score
Thinner |
0 The Galaxy Rush is thicker at 11.9mm
|
2 The One Touch C5 is thinner at 11.5mm
|
Smaller Size (CC) |
2 The Galaxy Rush has a smaller cubic volume of 1368817.953125
|
0 The One Touch C5 has a greater cubic volume of 1604402.734375
|
Less Weight |
2 The Galaxy Rush lighter at 119.1 grams
|
0 The One Touch C5 heavier at 157 grams
|
Screen Viewability |
0 The Galaxy Rush features a smaller 3.5" display
|
2 The One Touch C5 features a bigger 4.5" display
|
Pixel Density |
0
The Galaxy Rush has lower pixel density at 165 ppi
|
2
The One Touch C5 has a higher pixel density at 218 ppi
|
Newer |
0 The Galaxy Rush is older and was released on 08/2012
|
1 The One Touch C5 is newer and was released on 09/2013
|
Standby Time |
0 The Galaxy Rush can last less around 348 hours
|
1 The One Touch C5 can last more around 400 hours
|
Talk Time |
2 The Galaxy Rush can last more around 9 hours
|
0 The One Touch C5 can last less around 7.5 hours
|
Camera |
0 The One Touch C5 has a 3mp camera
|
2 The One Touch C5 has a 5mp camera
|
Total Points |
6 | 10 |
Total Score |
38% | 63% |
Why this score |
We have compared the most important features of the Samsung Galaxy Rush and the Alcatel One Touch C5 to give a non-biased opinion on which phone stacks better, and based on our results the Alcatel One Touch C5 has better specifications than the Samsung Galaxy Rush, it is safe to say that because there are significant differences we recommend the Alcatel One Touch C5. Note that the Galaxy Rush has 2 GB internal storage compared to 4 GB internal storage found in the One Touch C5 currently we are not scoring internal memory, processor number and speed and those should also be taken into consideration if you are interested in the Samsung Galaxy Rush or the Alcatel One Touch C5 |
Availability
Announced on |
August 2012 | September 2013 |
Available |
September 2012 | September 2013 |
Battery
Capacity |
1750 mAh | 1800 mAh |
Standby Time |
348 hours | 400 hours |
Talk Time |
9 hours | 8 hours |
Type |
Lithium Ion | Lithium Ion |
CPU
Core # |
- | 2 |
Speed |
1GHz | 1.3GHz |
Type |
Qualcomm MSM 8655 | - |
Camera
Main |
3mp (2048x1536) | 5mp (2592x1944) |
Secondary |
1280x1024 | VGA |
Video |
YES | VGA |
Connectivity & Data
Bluetooth |
4.0 (A2DP) | 4.0 (A2DP) |
EDGE |
- | YES |
GPRS |
- | YES |
GPS |
YES | YES |
HSCSD |
EV-DO Rev. A, up to 3.1 Mbps, LTE, HSPA | HSDPA 21Mbps, HSUPA 5.76Mbps |
USB |
2.0 microUSB | 2.0 microUSB |
Wireless |
Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
Display
Colors |
16.8 million | 16.8 million |
Resolution |
320x480 pixels | 480x854 pixels |
Size |
3.5 inches | 4.5 inches |
Type |
TFT capacitive touchscreen | FWVGA capacitive touchscreen |
General
2G Network |
CDMA 800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
3G Network |
CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | HSDPA 900, 2100 |
Alias |
SPH-M830 for Boost Mobile | Pop C5 |
Form Factor |
Slate | Slate |
Price Range |
$75-$150 | $300-$500 |
Memory
Card Slot |
microSD, up to 32GB | microSD, up to 32GB |
Internal |
2 GB | 4 GB |
Ram |
768 MB | 512MB |
Operating System
Type |
Android | Android |
Version |
4.0.4 | 4.2 |
Size and Weight
Depth |
11.9 mm (0.46 inches) | 11.5 mm (0.45 inches) |
Height |
122.9 mm (4.79 inches) | 131.5 mm (5.13 inches) |
Weight |
119 grams (4.2 ounces) | 157 grams (5.5 ounces) |
Width |
59.9 mm (2.34 inches) | 67.9 mm (2.65 inches) |